Adapted from J. McRee (Mac) Elrod's Monograph Cataloguing Cheat Sheet (RDA)
Desc:
040
100/600/700
100/110/700/710 $e - Relationship Designators
http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relaterm.html
e.g., $e actor, $e director.
[Because the presence of these X00/X10 $e subfields may cause split files in client OPACs, and/or in a single list of titles following an entry, imply a relation to subsequent titles which only applies to the first title, care should be taken in their use.]
110/610/710
111
130
240
245
245 $b
245 $h [GMD]
245 / $c
250
260/264
For producer or unpublished materials use:
264 #0 $a Place :$b Name, $c year.
For published materials use:
264 #1 $a Place :$b Name, $c year.
For distributor or aggregator of e-books
264 #2 $a Place : $b Name, $ c year.
For maker of equipment, e.g. Kobo or Kindle:
264 #3 $a Place : $b Name, $c year.
Assign only if copyright year differs from publication year, even if publication year in brackets:
264 #4 $c ©year
264 #4 $c copyright year
264 #4 $c (phonogram symbol) year
300 - Collation
336-338
336 Content type
337 Media type
338 Carrier type
490 $v
502
502 $a Thesis or Dissertation $b (Degree) $c Institution. $dyear.
504
588
600
700
7XX analytics
When You Can Abbreviate
Before RDA was implemented, catalogers were constantly being warned that we wouldn’t be able to abbreviate anything in a RDA record. As it turns out, that’s not exactly true.
Here’s a few guidelines for determining what can and cannot be abbreviated in a RDA record:
When You Can Use Brackets
In the Statement of Responsibility (245 |c): In AACR2, any part of the statement of responsibility that was not taken from the chief source of information had to be placed in brackets and the source given in a 500 note field. In RDA, you only need to use the brackets if the statement of responsibility is taken from someplace other than the resource itself. The preferred source for the statement of responsibility is the source of the title proper, but you can also get the information from elsewhere on the resource and still not have to put the statement in brackets or reference the source in a 500 note field.
If supplying a date of publication or production (264 |c): If the publication or production date is not clearly stated on the resource, you can ‘supply’ the date, if you’re sure of it, and put it in brackets.
Example:
When describing unnumbered pages in the 300 field: Do not use brackets when noting pagination. Instead, use the words “unnumbered pages”
Example:
When supplying series numeration not found on the resource (490 |v): Continue to put this information in brackets, just like in AACR2, and add a 500 note identifying the source.
Example:
Field 300 may end in no punctuation, may end in a right parenthesis, or may end in a period when either the last element is an abbreviation (“cm” and “mm” are not treated as abbreviations) or a 490 field is present in the record.
We never used to have to think much about the ISBD rules for this field until RDA because most 300 fields ended with a period anyway (the abbreviation “cm.” or “in.”). However, ‘cm’ is not considered an abbreviation in RDA, so now we have to be careful.
Examples:
Note: Abbreviations for duration and dimensions are allowed in RDA.
The reasoning behind this period/no period business has to do with areas of description in an ISBD display. Because the series statement and physical description are part of the same ‘paragraph’, a period is needed after the 300 to separate it from the 490 in the display. If there is no 490 field, then the 300 field is in a paragraph by itself and needs no ending punctuation.
RDA Punctuation
It was decided at the last EI Cataloging Committee meeting not to use RDA punctuation in bibliographic records but to continue to follow ISBD standards. This is an option available in RDA cataloging, and means we can continue to follow our current punctuation rules.
This decision also means if you see RDA style punctuation in a record, it should be changed to ISBD standards. The most common correction you will need to make is to remove the ‘double punctuation’ in some 245 and 250 fields.
Examples:
In each case, the ending period should be deleted!
Statement of Responsibility (245 $c) in RDA
In RDA, there is no “rule of three” like there is in AACR2. The general RDA rule is to transcribe a statement of responsibility in the form in which it appears, including the titles and honorifics. Record persons, families, and corporate bodies.
However, if more than three names are listed as performing the same responsibility or the same degree of responsibility, RDA also gives the option to omit all but the first name and summarize what has been omitted with words such as [and 4 others] in brackets. (Don’t use [et al.] or “…” in RDA.) For instance, if more than 3 authors are listed and none are singled out as the primary author, then you can omit as many names as you wish, so long as you list the first name. If there are four producers and five writers listed on a resource, you must list one producer and one writer but the rest of the names are optional. However, if only two or three persons, families, or corporate bodies share a responsibility, then all names must be included.
The Evergreen Indiana RDA cataloging guideline recently agreed upon by the EI Cataloging Committee is to accept the existing statement of responsibility as found, so long as it meets the guidelines above, but add more names and information to the record if desired. Please don’t delete any part of the existing statement, but add names and titles if you believe they are important and could be of interest to our patrons. So if you import an RDA record with a statement of responsibility listing 4 of the 6 authors, you can leave the record as is or enhance it by adding the omitted authors.
Examples of RDA statements of responsibility (field 245, subfield c):